"I think we ought to read only the kind of books that wound and stab us." Franz Kafka
For any author who would like his/her book to be reviewed, contact me. Poetry books too are solicited for reviewing. However, there are some genres I tend to avoid. Feel free to ask me.
gautami.tripathy[at]gmail.com
I must mention here that I read at my own pace and depending on my mood. Don't ask me to hurry.
Literary Blog Hop is hosted by The Blue Bookcase. If you features book reviews of literary fiction, classic literature, and general literary discussion, you too can join in!
This week's question is:
Is there such a thing as literary non-fiction? If so, how do you define it? Examples?
I would say yes, for the existence of literary non-fiction. It can broadly defined as creative nonfiction, literary journalism, and of course, the literature of fact. It is that branch of writing which makes use of writing style and creative vision that are connected with with fiction or poetry. That technique is employed to describe or report about actual people, places, or events. I think travelogues, autobiographies, biographies, memoirs, essays fall into the category. I also think scientific books too can be taken as literary non-fiction. In Cold Blood by Truman Capote is a true account which reads like a novel. The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol 1-3 along George Bernard Shaw's essay collection, Naom Chomsky's writings are few examples...
©
gautami tripathy
at
14:05
Labels: literary blog hop
Powered by Blogger. DownRight Blogger Theme v3.0 created by (© 2007) Thur Broeders
Posts
22 comments:
Great post, G.B Shaw is indeed amazing.
I have to wonder if there is a distinction between a non-fiction novel (like In Cold Blood) and literary non-fiction? I was thinking more of memoir or essays in my post. I have no answer, just wondering...
I like the distinction you made about writing style and creative vision...a good way to define what separates it from other stuff.
A nice, neat 'yes', then!
I don't read much science, but I have friends who would totally agree with you on that.
Thats definitely a good way t think of it
I like that phrase "literature of fact." I loved In Cold Blood as well.
I read The Canon, a book about the various aspects of science, a while back. It was beautifully written, full of lovely metaphors. So unexpected, finding a literary book about science.
Here's my post on literary nonfiction. I'd love to hear what you think.
And if you have read any wonderful literary books
published in 2010, I urge you to nominate your favorites
for The Independent Literary Awards. The awards
include categories of Literary Fiction and Literary Non-Fiction.
Nominations close December 15.
I'm sorely missing out by not having read In Cold Blood yet -- I'm a tad ashamed on this! Here's my Literary view...: Coffee and a Book Chick -- Literary Blog Hop...
I've decided that I'm partial to literary journalism. Good answer!
I think everyone agrees with Capote's 'In Cold Blood'. It truly is an extraordinary account. Great post.
I like your your take on literary nonfiction thanks for stopping by my
blog man are you busy!
Whenever I think of "Literary non-fiction" I always think of In Cold Blood as well--such a revolutionary book in terms of creative non-fiction.
Naom Chomsky is a fantastic writer & one I had forgotten, thanks for the reminder.
Parrish
I think I need to read In Cold Blood soon everyone seems to think that it is a great example of literary non-fiction.
Thank you for sharing your viewpoint.
I mentioned In Cold Blood in my post as well. I guess it comes down to the writer's craft.
Thanks for stopping by my blog.
I didn't even think of Truman Capote and the like. That is definitely a good example.
-Emily @ Reading While Female
I forgot about George Bernard Shaw! I've not read him yet, but I want to. :-)
After posting my response, I went from blog to blog and was surprised to see how many of us thought of In Cold Blood--very interesting!
When I was in med school the pathology text we used was quite literary (IMO). It was filled with anecdotes and personal observations and was very readable as well as informative. The book is revised every few years and we are now several editions down the road. It is less wordy now, has more colorful charts and tables and a different organization. It's more "efficient." But I can't imagine losing myself in the reading of it, soaking it in, the way I did with the text that I was fortunate enough to use. Yes, science can be literary.
You were able to come up with a lot more examples then I could. I completely agree with you.
Sarah @ Loving Books
Your post does a nice job of defining what makes something literary (much more concisely than mine). Good suggestions -- obviously In Cold Blood but Feynman and GB Shaw as well.
Thanks for visiting my blog!
Post a Comment